Parameterized Inapproximability for Steiner Orientation by Gap Amplification

In the k-Steiner Orientation problem, we are given a mixed graph, that is, with both directed and undirected edges, and a set of k terminal pairs. The goal is to find an orientation of the undirected edges that maximizes the number of terminal pairs for which there is a path from the source to the sink. The problem is known to be W[1]-hard when parameterized by k and hard to approximate up to some constant for FPT algorithms assuming Gap-ETH. On the other hand, no approximation factor better than ?(k) is known. We show that k-Steiner Orientation is unlikely to admit an approximation algorithm with any constant factor, even within FPT running time. To obtain this result, we construct a self-reduction via a hashing-based gap amplification technique, which turns out useful even outside of the FPT paradigm. Precisely, we rule out any approximation factor of the form (log k)^o(1) for FPT algorithms (assuming FPT ? W[1]) and (log n)^o(1) for purely polynomial-time algorithms (assuming that the class W[1] does not admit randomized FPT algorithms). This constitutes a novel inapproximability result for polynomial-time algorithms obtained via tools from the FPT theory. Moreover, we prove k-Steiner Orientation to belong to W[1], which entails W[1]-completeness of (log k)^o(1)-approximation for k-Steiner Orientation. This provides an example of a natural approximation task that is complete in a parameterized complexity class. Finally, we apply our technique to the maximization version of directed multicut - Max (k,p)-Directed Multicut - where we are given a directed graph, k terminals pairs, and a budget p. The goal is to maximize the number of separated terminal pairs by removing p edges. We present a simple proof that the problem admits no FPT approximation with factor ?(k^(1/2 - ?)) (assuming FPT ? W[1]) and no polynomial-time approximation with ratio ?(|E(G)|^(1/2 - ?)) (assuming NP ? co-RP)

Finding Long Directed Cycles Is Hard Even When DFVS Is Small or Girth Is Large

We study the parameterized complexity of two classic problems on directed graphs: Hamiltonian Cycle and its generalization Longest Cycle. Since 2008, it is known that Hamiltonian Cycle is W[1]-hard when parameterized by directed treewidth [Lampis et al., ISSAC\u2708]. By now, the question of whether it is FPT parameterized by the directed feedback vertex set (DFVS) number has become a longstanding open problem. In particular, the DFVS number is the largest natural directed width measure studied in the literature. In this paper, we provide a negative answer to the question, showing that even for the DFVS number, the problem remains W[1]-hard. As a consequence, we also obtain that Longest Cycle is W[1]-hard on directed graphs when parameterized multiplicatively above girth, in contrast to the undirected case. This resolves an open question posed by Fomin et al. [ACM ToCT\u2721] and Gutin and Mnich [arXiv:2207.12278]. Our hardness results apply to the path versions of the problems as well. On the positive side, we show that Longest Path parameterized multiplicatively above girth belongs to the class XP

Optimal Polynomial-Time Compression for Boolean Max CSP

In the Boolean maximum constraint satisfaction problem - Max CSP(?) - one is given a collection of weighted applications of constraints from a finite constraint language ?, over a common set of variables, and the goal is to assign Boolean values to the variables so that the total weight of satisfied constraints is maximized. There exists a concise dichotomy theorem providing a criterion on ? for the problem to be polynomial-time solvable and stating that otherwise it becomes NP-hard. We study the NP-hard cases through the lens of kernelization and provide a complete characterization of Max CSP(?) with respect to the optimal compression size. Namely, we prove that Max CSP(?) parameterized by the number of variables n is either polynomial-time solvable, or there exists an integer d ? 2 depending on ?, such that: 1) An instance of Max CSP(?) can be compressed into an equivalent instance with ?(n^d log n) bits in polynomial time, 2) Max CSP(?) does not admit such a compression to ?(n^{d-?}) bits unless NP ? co-NP / poly. Our reductions are based on interpreting constraints as multilinear polynomials combined with the framework of constraint implementations. As another application of our reductions, we reveal tight connections between optimal running times for solving Max CSP(?). More precisely, we show that obtaining a running time of the form ?(2^{(1-?)n}) for particular classes of Max CSPs is as hard as breaching this barrier for Max d-SAT for some d

Preprocessing for Outerplanar Vertex Deletion: An Elementary Kernel of Quartic Size

In the ?-Minor-Free Deletion problem one is given an undirected graph G, an integer k, and the task is to determine whether there exists a vertex set S of size at most k, so that G-S contains no graph from the finite family ? as a minor. It is known that whenever ? contains at least one planar graph, then ?-Minor-Free Deletion admits a polynomial kernel, that is, there is a polynomial-time algorithm that outputs an equivalent instance of size k^{?(1)} [Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra, Saurabh; FOCS 2012]. However, this result relies on non-constructive arguments based on well-quasi-ordering and does not provide a concrete bound on the kernel size. We study the Outerplanar Deletion problem, in which we want to remove at most k vertices from a graph to make it outerplanar. This is a special case of ?-Minor-Free Deletion for the family ? = {K?, K_{2,3}}. The class of outerplanar graphs is arguably the simplest class of graphs for which no explicit kernelization size bounds are known. By exploiting the combinatorial properties of outerplanar graphs we present elementary reduction rules decreasing the size of a graph. This yields a constructive kernel with ?(k?) vertices and edges. As a corollary, we derive that any minor-minimal obstruction to having an outerplanar deletion set of size k has ?(k?) vertices and edges

On the Hardness of Compressing Weights

We investigate computational problems involving large weights through the lens of kernelization, which is a framework of polynomial-time preprocessing aimed at compressing the instance size. Our main focus is the weighted Clique problem, where we are given an edge-weighted graph and the goal is to detect a clique of total weight equal to a prescribed value. We show that the weighted variant, parameterized by the number of vertices $n$, is significantly harder than the unweighted problem by presenting an $O(n^{3 - \varepsilon})$ lower bound on the size of the kernel, under the assumption that NP $\not \subseteq$ coNP/poly. This lower bound is essentially tight: we show that we can reduce the problem to the case with weights bounded by $2^{O(n)}$, which yields a randomized kernel of $O(n^3)$ bits. We generalize these results to the weighted $d$-Uniform Hyperclique problem, Subset Sum, and weighted variants of Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). We also study weighted minimization problems and show that weight compression is easier when we only want to preserve the collection of optimal solutions. Namely, we show that for node-weighted Vertex Cover on bipartite graphs it is possible to maintain the set of optimal solutions using integer weights from the range $[1, n]$, but if we want to maintain the ordering of the weights of all inclusion-minimal solutions, then weights as large as $2^{\Omega(n)}$ are necessary.Comment: To appear at MFCS'2

5-Approximation for ?-Treewidth Essentially as Fast as ?-Deletion Parameterized by Solution Size

The notion of ?-treewidth, where ? is a hereditary graph class, was recently introduced as a generalization of the treewidth of an undirected graph. Roughly speaking, a graph of ?-treewidth at most k can be decomposed into (arbitrarily large) ?-subgraphs which interact only through vertex sets of size ?(k) which can be organized in a tree-like fashion. ?-treewidth can be used as a hybrid parameterization to develop fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for ?-deletion problems, which ask to find a minimum vertex set whose removal from a given graph G turns it into a member of ?. The bottleneck in the current parameterized algorithms lies in the computation of suitable tree ?-decompositions. We present FPT-approximation algorithms to compute tree ?-decompositions for hereditary and union-closed graph classes ?. Given a graph of ?-treewidth k, we can compute a 5-approximate tree ?-decomposition in time f(?(k)) ? n^?(1) whenever ?-deletion parameterized by solution size can be solved in time f(k) ? n^?(1) for some function f(k) ? 2^k. The current-best algorithms either achieve an approximation factor of k^?(1) or construct optimal decompositions while suffering from non-uniformity with unknown parameter dependence. Using these decompositions, we obtain algorithms solving Odd Cycle Transversal in time 2^?(k) ? n^?(1) parameterized by bipartite-treewidth and Vertex Planarization in time 2^?(k log k) ? n^?(1) parameterized by planar-treewidth, showing that these can be as fast as the solution-size parameterizations and giving the first ETH-tight algorithms for parameterizations by hybrid width measures